Far East Cynic

The beatings will continue till morale improves……

The teabaggers are leading a revolution all right, its just more similar to the French one than the American.

It would appear it is not just Black Shoes that eat their own.

Ronald Reagan weeps……………

  1. Could you change the header of your page please? I haven’t seen my wife for two years, but we are getting very close and I find the cartoon picture distracting. thank you for your consideration of my request and I enjoy your take on the this f’d mess. Sorry you aren’t living in the east. I miss it too.

  2. I find it hilarious how so many people, like you, try to claim that Reagan would weep over the Tea Party activities. Most of you don’t have the slightest idea what Reagan would think about it.

    I saw one remark that they didn’t vote for Angle because they wanted a Republican Party that Reagan and Bush 1 would proud of. Bush 1 despised Reagan and did everything he could to destroy the Reagan legacy. The current Republican Party is owned by the Country Clubbers like Bush 1. Reagan certainly did not represent that bunch. He really was a Tea Party type to the core of his political being.

    What you want Skippy San is the Country Clubbers who will roll over for the left as long as they get their rice bowls filled on a regular basis.

  3. QM,

    Thank you for proving my point. Reagan had an 11th commandment did he not? “Thall shall not speak ill of thy fellow Republicans.” He’s also the guy who reached across the aisle to Tip O’Neill and brought Democrats into his electoral majority. That’s a far cry from teabagger America.

    From The Hill-hardly a whacked out liberal publication:

    “I think this would be a tough time for Ronald Reagan and Jack Kemp,” Inglis added. “They were optimists that believe in America. Right now, unfortunately, conservatism is being presented with a voice of snarling rather than a face of smiling, and it really doesn’t fit America.”

    When Republicans turn their backs on those two guys in the name of ideological purity-it is a sad time indeed. Even more so when they trash Bush 1-who understood what governing was really about.

    So yes, I will continue to hold the teabaggers in the contempt they richly deserve.

  4. Yep,
    nothing but contempt for guys and gals that like to picnic and not leave a mess. S’funny, they hate you back. A lot.

  5. Curtis,

    And that is what is really wrong with politics in America today. Its not about their picnic habits ( although here in Alabama they don’t seem to be as neat as their northern brethern). Its about the ideas they espouse and the historical accuracy of their perceptions of the Constitution. There, they are a little lacking.

    Isn’t it you who decries me for being a hater?

  6. no no. They hate you back big time. They want your ilk to vanish and go away forever. You are failing to realize that the hate of the left has engendered a hate from conservatives of truly biblical proportion. You got so used to hating them and expecting some sense of proportion from them and now……they hate you back a lot.

    You guys are ELF and ALF and Al Queda. You have self identified with pure haters who show up at all the rallies of the left and at ever G7 or G20 meeting or burn down research facilities trash towns, public streets, peoples cars. LEFT=HATE. Hey Luna, whanna climb a tree for 3 years to hold off UC Berkeley plans for a new building? HATE.

    Read left wing shit and read HATE.

    The indies are starting to clue up and recognize hate when they see it. The left radiates it like an Aegis. Nobody much likes the hate.

    Tell me, did you ever see a Conservative show up filled with hate at a rally of any kind?

    Oh and skippy, let’s nail the dialog to the mast shall we? A left wing fanatic is a statist. There’s no such thing in the conservative wing. Fascists are your’s too. They’re socialists and statists. We really hate you all.

  7. Tell me, did you ever see a Conservative show up filled with hate at a rally of any kind?

    Beck, Hannity, Limbaugh, O’ Reilly in one of his fits, the list is long and undistinguished.

    Assholes. They’re all assholes. The overwhelming majority of them aren’t merely partisan hacks, they’re remorseless fucking liars that justify the very worst aspects of the human spirit, so long as they’re associated with their party label. They’re no different from the gang over at the Daily Kos and they’re not even pretending to be, anymore.

  8. no no,

    They just tell the truth. almost without hate. Compare and contrast with your hatist leftists who get all dizzy with hate when those names come up.

  9. not really.

    All of them are payed fortunes to go in front of the public by advertisers and stuff and then then they lay out straightforward rational arguments. If you care to think about it, Air America had to pay through the nose to broadcast where Rush was paid through the nose to broadcast. Read the stats on the rest of the spectrum at Drudge. He puts them up from time to time.

    Don’t put too much thought into it. Just name the superhuge colossal counterpart to Rush……… right here. Think about why they can’t do it.

  10. Just name the superhuge colossal counterpart to Rush

    That is kind of the point isn’t it? A well educated electorate does not require a Rush-because it gets its info from a variety of sources-not from a fat, viagra fueled blowhard.

  11. The fact that you don’t get it simplifies lefties. You really are simple folk.

    I’ll ask you the question again.

    Where/what is the left counterpart to Rush? People/advertisers pay him to broadcast and the best the left can up with is NPR and Air America. In the first case, they steal my money and in the second even if they could find the financing they couldn’t keep that crap on the air since they had no base, few advertisers, etc.

    You and your ilk think you’re the majority but where is the”voice” outside of NPR or PBS, both publicly funded by liberal assholes? Is Jerimiah Wright your voice?

    All of your spokesman have kind of done their Auto de Fe.

  12. I’ll answer the question again. There is no need for a counterpart to Rush because in general, liberalism places a premium on informed discussion and debate-not the rantings of a fat, viagra fueled blowhard.

    Or phrased another way-they are listening to something fun like Howard Stern or music instead of a fat viagra fueled blowhard.

    When necessary they watch their favorite program on : ( fill in the blank here-but it won’t be Fox News).

    I am my own voice. I don’t need some asshole to be one for me.

    And NPR gets a lot of its money from private sources-and the money is not stolen, you freely gave it up. Whether you like it or not.

  13. Skippy,

    Once upon a time, I followed a path. It was a most cruel path. They were the Society of Jesus. I was certainly not one of them. I tend to look at the facts and draw my own conclusions and you clearly tend to look at the conclusions of your mystic buddies without any regard for the facts.