I, like many people, subscribe to Navy Times. And, if you have been a follower of this blog for some time, you that I very upset with some of the news about the Navy, my Navy, that it reports.
And in the latest edition to arrive in my mailbox, the news paper did not disappoint.
There are two things on this cover I would draw your attention to. First, is the sacking of RDML Williams for viewing porn on his computer and the over reaction to it.
Now of course, I am quite certain the admiral knew that you should not view porn on Navy computers. However if you dig through the story, you will find out that the story is not as clear cut as the headline makes out-and it begs an equally important question of why, on the network that blocks many sites that are not controversial at all, the IP’s he went to were not already blocked. And so, during a time when an Admiral should be sitting on his hands-so as to allow time for his staff to get work done-he surfed to someplace the Navy did not want him to go.
Two points before moving on, Nora Tyson. 1) All men look at porn.
“Guys, including your boyfriend, like porn. So do a lot of women. Men just get off to visuals more easily, which is why it always seems to be guys watching all the porn. It doesn’t mean men are constantly looking at porn and self-pleasuring like fiendish deviants. Your boyfriend (probably) doesn’t have some insane stash of weird fetish porn and Fleshlights hidden somewhere in his walls. But most guys look at porn on a fairly regular basis. ”
Which is always why you use anonymous proxies and VPN’s.
And 2), while Navy Times was dragging up all the sordid details of this little incident, it and Nora Tyson along with much of the rest of Navy leadership was ignoring a much, much bigger crime.
Go back to the Navy Times cover again. Look at the main picture and lead. There in bold print you have the Navy bragging, through a PR outlet that it put a ship on cruise for 9 months when it did not have to.
One of the saddest consequences of the Navy’s part of our blind stumble into a pointless war on Iraq was the way the Navy jumped with both feet into a course of action that made the Navy’s OPTEMPO and deployment schedule a train wreck. By making a rather fool hardy decision to send 5 carrier battle battle groups to the Gulf. And then to aggravate the issue, technology increased the number of ships required for various other types of commitments. Add to that the insatiable appetite of the combatant commands for more ships and “voila“, here we are.
The greatest failure of Navy leadership in the 13 years since the foolhardy invasion of Iraq ( which, by the way, ranks as the single biggest foreign policy disaster of the last 40 years), is the failure of the Navy and the country in general, is to get the Navy’s OPTEMPO back to six months portal to portal. Having people going through sea tours and getting three cruises in three years, all of them 7 months plus ( or more) is really criminal.
But hey, knock yourself out being upset about a rather experienced man getting a few looks at big tits.