I want write about the abomination that is the Romney campaign-and the failed dirt digging that is the Liars Club and their reaction to a reasonable statement. John Cole framed it well when he voiced the same sentiment I have:
What a crazy position for an American President to take- to actually focus on American security concerns and American foreign policy goals. It’s almost like Obama understands we are not an Israeli client state.
Call me an anti-Semite, but I guess I just have no problem with my President looking out for US foreign policy goals. Crazy, that.
Five trips to Israel in the last year have convinced me of a couple of things: 1) Israel is a vital ally of the United States and will remain so, and nothing this President has done has effectively denied that fact. In fact he's worked steadily and privately to strengthen the United States support for Israel. 2) Israelis are among the most obstinate and unreasonable people on the earth. I know that will offend some people-but its the truth. Yes there is a historical background for it-but time has marched on, and despite what the religious right believes, Jerusalem is not at the center of the world vortex right now. Americans, as a whole, do not understand what Israel is really like-rather they have a preconceived idea of what they think it is like.
Finally, Israel's interests and ours are not in complete alignment. No nations is-but particularly the interest of a nation that is founded, rightly or wrongly, as a religious state. Or the secular representation of a particular religion. It is natural, that in the course of events-Israel and the US will disagree. That does not make the US any less of a friend nor does it make the Israeli whining about certain matters nothing more than noise on particular issues. The President was right to say that and the folks over at the Weekly Standard can just go suck eggs. There is more to foreign policy than the views of AIPAC.
William Kristol and Benjamin Netenyahu should both realize that.
There! I feel better for having gotten that off of my chest. There are others who agree with me.
And here we see the perils of believing your own hype — apparently Bibi and friends actuallybelieved the idea of the all-powerful Israel Lobby. Whether through Romney's bald-faced pandering to that perceived lobby with his ugly comments about the cultural inferiority of Palestinians or, more shockingly, through Netanyahu's decision to take sides in the 2012 presidential campaign, they seem to think that if they can portray Obama as "weak on Israel" they will materially advance their own causes. It's worth noting, of course, that those interests are different. For Romney, the approach only works if it undermines Obama in key states, notably Florida. For Netanyahu, it would work if the fear of losing Jewish support pushed Obama to get visibly tougher on Iran, to accept, for example, the Israeli leader's call for clearly demarked and more aggressive "red lines" with Iran.
Never been to Isreal but whether they are the most "obstinate" is rather too much hyperbole for me, having lived in Korea where I came to the same conclusion about Koreans!!!!!!!. and I know I am RIGHT when I say that KOREANS are the MOST obstinate!!!!! (Think Dokdo) but then there are the Japanese/……
By the way, AMERICAN Jews are not monolithic when it comes to Isreal..of course they want the Jewish state to survive but many understand the dangers and pitfalls of attacking Iran and not finding a solution to the Palestinian "problem"
The "Jews" will vote for Obama, its in our DNA to vote Liberal and Obama, despite the hand wringing by MSNBC et al, Obama is a shooo-in IF IF IF his base comes out to vote!!!!!!!
Notice I said , "Among the most obstinate…".
and in the meantime the Japanese/Koreans/Chinese/Vietnamese/Phillipines are having their own obstinate unreasonableness moments…60 years and animus still remains an open sore among many.