Scott Adams imagines a world without political parties:
I’m fascinated by the fact that the freedom to organize into political parties limits our other freedoms more than most people realize. Political parties make the government incompetent, and the result of ineffective government is that citizens are less prosperous. Poverty is the ultimate restriction of freedom.
If Thomas Jefferson sprung back to life today, and learned about the Internet, I wonder how he would recommend changing the Constitution of the United States. I think he would favor banning political parties.
One of his commenters makes a great point-that while political parties may be difficult to get rid, compulsory voting-like they have in Australia-would go a long way to limiting their damage. This because, “It would shift the focus away from the fanatical and the terrified, and force moderates to get into the game. They could still write in candidates or spoil their ballots (effectively voting “none of the above”), but they’d have to turn up and do it in person. As a bonus, it would also put a stop to most voter-suppression shenanigans.”
Was Scott this concerned when the unwashed masses voted in the dems to the House?
This is an issue that has bedeviled our founding fathers since the beginning of the Constuititional Republic.
Calhoun, for one , wrote about this issue all the time.
How to reconcile the needs of the many etc etc.
Its even worse now because we are such a diverse country
and each ‘tribe” has its own needs and wants.
Don’t know what the answer is…
Perhaps Lew Kuan Yew had it right.
somtimes one wonders where the “humanity” really is…
Rie fu