Under the category of ” I did not see that coming…” it would seem that when Sarah Palin needs to inject herself into the news cycle, and she is out of ideas ( a process that takes all of 30 seconds), she falls back on her funbags:
Which brings me, in a roundabout way, to the former governor’s tits. Mrs. Palin is possessed of a remarkable rack. Those are truly formidable funbags, particularly for a middle-aged woman who has had no fewer than five kids. She’s nothing less than three times hotter than America’s next sexiest governor, the Canadian Jennifer Granholm.
Because there hasn’t been anything serious happening in America this past week, there has been a great debate over whether Palin’s had her milkbags enhanced. Enquiring minds, after all, need to know … like me. Not that I care all that much. I’m of the unyielding conviction that all women over thirty should have their cans done, if only because I’m a compassionate conservative who cares deeply about family values. Nothing has driving up the divorce rate quite like wives with droopy jugs. Don’t those wives know that there are young secretaries with perky knockers out there just begging for overweight, balding husbands?
Palin denies having work done and I have no reason to disbelieve her, which might be a first. I think that she might be genetically perfect, or as polite society would put it, a mutant.
But that’s why she’s popular in the first place. I’m actually shocked that normally serious people would suggest otherwise. I can’t think of another reason why sa rational adult could listen to someone who’s being paid $2 million from America’s largest cable news network rail against “the lamestream media” without breaking out into hysterical laughter. That someone like Bill O’Reilly can pretend to take her seriously says more about O’Reilly’s skills as a thespian than it does about Palin’s integrity or intelligence.
I seriously doubt that Palin got a boob job-although it would be great to think that she did. Where is Elaine when you need her?